On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> >
> > This fixes PR51528 by hiding the issue that SRA generates
> > copy in/out with a type not suitable for preserving the data
> > (any non-mode-precision thing). It fixes it by instead of
> > emit
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> This fixes PR51528 by hiding the issue that SRA generates
> copy in/out with a type not suitable for preserving the data
> (any non-mode-precision thing). It fixes it by instead of
> emitting
>
> x$i_8 = x.i;
> D.1720 = x;
> D.1720.i = x$i_
This fixes PR51528 by hiding the issue that SRA generates
copy in/out with a type not suitable for preserving the data
(any non-mode-precision thing). It fixes it by instead of
emitting
x$i_8 = x.i;
D.1720 = x;
D.1720.i = x$i_8;
for an assign to an unscalarized D.1720 from a partly scalar
