On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
This improves var-tracking dataflow convergence by using post order
on the inverted CFG - which is appropriate for forward dataflow
problems. This haves compile-time spent in var-tracking for PR45364
(it also improves
On Jan 20, 2014, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:24:36PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
But I think this one is wrong.
if (var-onepart == ONEPART_VALUE)
{
if (local_get_addr_cache == NULL)
return;
But when local_get_addr_cache is non-NULL, no matter if we
This improves var-tracking dataflow convergence by using post order
on the inverted CFG - which is appropriate for forward dataflow
problems. This haves compile-time spent in var-tracking for PR45364
(it also improves other testcases, but that one seems to be the best
case).
For this to pass
On Jan 20, 2014, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
local_get_addr_clear_given_value (const void *v ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
void **slot, void *x)
{
! if (*slot != NULL
!vt_get_canonicalize_base ((rtx)*slot) == x)
*slot = NULL;
return
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:24:36PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
! if (var-onepart == ONEPART_VALUE)
{
rtx x = dv_as_value (dv);
void **slot;
--- 2502,2509
gcc_assert (var-n_var_parts == 1);
! if (var-onepart == ONEPART_VALUE
!
