Hello!
> The attached patch revises the tests for the filds and fists
> mnemonics to use the assembly...
>
> filds mem(%rip); fists mem(%rip)
>
> and the test for the fildq and fistq mnemonics to use the assembly...
>
> fildq mem(%rip); fistpq mem(%rip)
>
> which will assemble for both 64-bit an
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jun 12, 2015, at 8:25 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> The attached patch revises the tests for the filds and fists
>> mnemonics to use the assembly...
>>
>> filds mem(%rip); fists mem(%rip)
>
>> Okay for gcc trunk?
>
> Fine from a darwin persp
On Jun 12, 2015, at 8:25 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> The attached patch revises the tests for the filds and fists
> mnemonics to use the assembly...
>
> filds mem(%rip); fists mem(%rip)
> Okay for gcc trunk?
Fine from a darwin perspective, but I would like an x86 binutils person to
weigh in to
The attached patch revises the tests for the filds and fists
mnemonics to use the assembly...
filds mem(%rip); fists mem(%rip)
and the test for the fildq and fistq mnemonics to use the assembly...
fildq mem(%rip); fistpq mem(%rip)
which will assemble for both 64-bit and 32-bit mode. This is