On 04/17/2018 02:54 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The first hunk is I think rather obvious, -2147483648 should be printed
> as -2147483648 and doesn't need to introduce UB in the compiler while doing
> so. The changes to stabstr_D are analogous, but in addition to that I don't
> see why we
On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 22:54 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> PR debug/84637
> * dbxout.c (dbxout_int): Perform negation in unsigned int type.
> (stabstr_D): Change type of unum from unsigned int to
> unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT. Perform negation in unsigned
> HOST_WIDE_INT
>
Hi!
The first hunk is I think rather obvious, -2147483648 should be printed
as -2147483648 and doesn't need to introduce UB in the compiler while doing
so. The changes to stabstr_D are analogous, but in addition to that I don't
see why we should just strip away the upper bits, it is again just a
