On 1/26/19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following 4 define_insn shuffle patterns don't have sufficient
> conditions. As can be seen even from the way how they transform the
> RTL representation into the mask, e.g.:
> mask = INTVAL (operands[3]) / 2;
> mask |= INTVAL (operands[5]) / 2 <
Hi!
The following 4 define_insn shuffle patterns don't have sufficient
conditions. As can be seen even from the way how they transform the
RTL representation into the mask, e.g.:
mask = INTVAL (operands[3]) / 2;
mask |= INTVAL (operands[5]) / 2 << 2;
mask |= (INTVAL (operands[7]) - 8) / 2 <