On 04/20/2015 09:02 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
But never mind, I'm getting hundreds of failures from C tests that
define main without a parameter list e.g. "int main () { ... }". This
is an issue not worth fixing..
Yep, that's what I was wondering. I think it makes sense to fix this
testcase i
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 04/19/2015 07:45 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>
>> stdarg_p() apparently returns false for a variadic function that has no
>> concrete parameters, e.g. "void foo (...);". This patch fixes this
>> issue by removing the predicate's seemingly
On 04/19/2015 07:45 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
stdarg_p() apparently returns false for a variadic function that has no
concrete parameters, e.g. "void foo (...);". This patch fixes this
issue by removing the predicate's seemingly bogus "n != NULL_TREE" test.
What does this do with K&R non-protot
stdarg_p() apparently returns false for a variadic function that has no
concrete parameters, e.g. "void foo (...);". This patch fixes this
issue by removing the predicate's seemingly bogus "n != NULL_TREE" test.
(Zero-parameter functions like "void bar (void);" will always have a
void_type_node s
