On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 31/01/12 22:07, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> On 31/01/12 22:05, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>> Richard,
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, with patch this time.
>>
>>> this patch fixes PR52009.
>>>
>>> Consider this test-case:
>>> ...
>>> int z;
>>>
>>> void
>>> foo (int
On 31/01/12 22:07, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 31/01/12 22:05, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Richard,
>>
>
> Sorry, with patch this time.
>
>> this patch fixes PR52009.
>>
>> Consider this test-case:
>> ...
>> int z;
>>
>> void
>> foo (int y)
>> {
>> if (y == 6)
>> z = 5;
>> else
>> z = 5;
>> }
On 31/01/12 22:05, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Richard,
>
Sorry, with patch this time.
> this patch fixes PR52009.
>
> Consider this test-case:
> ...
> int z;
>
> void
> foo (int y)
> {
> if (y == 6)
> z = 5;
> else
> z = 5;
> }
> ...
>
> Currently, compiling with -O2 gives us this repr
Richard,
this patch fixes PR52009.
Consider this test-case:
...
int z;
void
foo (int y)
{
if (y == 6)
z = 5;
else
z = 5;
}
...
Currently, compiling with -O2 gives us this representation at
pr51879-7.c.094t.pre:
...
# BLOCK 3 freq:1991
# PRED: 2 [19.9%] (true,exec)
# .MEMD.17
