On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:24:26AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Perhaps it would make sense to commit the fortran/ change separately to fix
> > the leak in there, and resolve the rest in a follow-up when it is clear what
> > to do in the C++ FE.
>
> Yes. Does the copy_node change pass testi
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 03:29:28PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > init_function_start is these days supposed to be called only at the start
>> > of
>> > RTL expansion, it shouldn
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 03:29:28PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > init_function_start is these days supposed to be called only at the start of
> > RTL expansion, it shouldn't be called much earlier, because then we leak
> > e.g. the memor
