On 03/06/2018 01:03 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> If we discover some bad inline-asm during reg-stack processing and we
>> error on those, we replace that inline-asm with a (use (const_int 0))
>> and therefore the various assumptions of
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If we discover some bad inline-asm during reg-stack processing and we
> error on those, we replace that inline-asm with a (use (const_int 0))
> and therefore the various assumptions of reg-stack pass may not hold.
> Seems we already ha
Hi!
If we discover some bad inline-asm during reg-stack processing and we
error on those, we replace that inline-asm with a (use (const_int 0))
and therefore the various assumptions of reg-stack pass may not hold.
Seems we already have a couple of spots which are more permissive if
any_malformed_a
