On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 08:12:44PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 12:07:51PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > Admittedly, it might be better if the initializer was 0x1010101 or say
> > > 0x4030201 because on big endian in particular 0x10101 has the top 15 bits
> > > all
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 12:07:51PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > Admittedly, it might be better if the initializer was 0x1010101 or say
> > 0x4030201 because on big endian in particular 0x10101 has the top 15 bits
> > all zero and thus that is what is in u.f1, so if the bug can be repro
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 06:31:43PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > As mentioned in the PR, the testcase fails on big-endian targets.
> > > The following patch tweaks it so that it does not fail there and still
> > > checks for the original bug.
> >
> > It relies on a certain bitfield layout, not
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:23:38AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 02:13:55PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > As mentioned in the PR, the testcase fails on big-endian targets.
> > The following patch tweaks it so that it does not fail there and still
> > checks f
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 02:13:55PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> As mentioned in the PR, the testcase fails on big-endian targets.
> The following patch tweaks it so that it does not fail there and still
> checks for the original bug.
It relies on a certain bitfield layout, not just on LE. I
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, the testcase fails on big-endian targets.
The following patch tweaks it so that it does not fail there and still
checks for the original bug.
Tested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk and release branches?
2018-11-21 Jakub Jelinek
PR rtl-optimiza
