Re: [PATCH] Fix up _Pragma GCC diagnostics regressions (PR preprocessor/69543, PR c/69558)

2016-02-01 Thread Jeff Law
On 01/29/2016 10:57 PM, David Malcolm wrote: On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 20:50 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Hi! This patch reverts one tiny change from r228049 changes (which hasn't been mentioned in the ChangeLog or patch description). We definitely need to revisit this for GCC 7, but stage4 is

Re: [PATCH] Fix up _Pragma GCC diagnostics regressions (PR preprocessor/69543, PR c/69558)

2016-01-30 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 06:57:48AM +0100, David Malcolm wrote: > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 20:50 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > This patch reverts one tiny change from r228049 changes (which hasn't > > been > > mentioned in the ChangeLog or patch description). We definitely need > > to

Re: [PATCH] Fix up _Pragma GCC diagnostics regressions (PR preprocessor/69543, PR c/69558)

2016-01-29 Thread David Malcolm
On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 20:50 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > This patch reverts one tiny change from r228049 changes (which hasn't > been > mentioned in the ChangeLog or patch description). We definitely need > to > revisit this for GCC 7, but stage4 is probably not the right time for >

[PATCH] Fix up _Pragma GCC diagnostics regressions (PR preprocessor/69543, PR c/69558)

2016-01-29 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! This patch reverts one tiny change from r228049 changes (which hasn't been mentioned in the ChangeLog or patch description). We definitely need to revisit this for GCC 7, but stage4 is probably not the right time for that, and the patch fixes e.g. tons of warnings (or with -Werror errors on