On 8/19/2021 9:53 AM, Roger Sayle wrote:
An issue with a backend patch I've been investigating has revealed
a missed optimization opportunity during GCC's vector lowering pass.
An unrecognized insn for "(set (reg:SI) (not:SI (const_int 0))"
revealed that not only was my expander not expecting
An issue with a backend patch I've been investigating has revealed
a missed optimization opportunity during GCC's vector lowering pass.
An unrecognized insn for "(set (reg:SI) (not:SI (const_int 0))"
revealed that not only was my expander not expecting a NOT with
a constant operand, but also that
