On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Doing a movl + shlq by constant seems to be 1 byte shorter
> than movabsq, so this patch attempts to use the former form
> unless flags is live.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
>
> Performance-
Hi!
Doing a movl + shlq by constant seems to be 1 byte shorter
than movabsq, so this patch attempts to use the former form
unless flags is live.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
Performance-wise, not really sure what is a win (on i7-5960X on the
testcase in th