Re: [PATCH] IBM Z: Remove match_scratch workaround

2021-06-02 Thread Andreas Krebbel via Gcc-patches
On 6/2/21 4:21 AM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x-redhat-linux. Ok for master? > > > > Since commit dd1ef00c45ba ("Fix bug in the define_subst handling that > made match_scratch unusable for multi-alternative patterns.") the > workaround for that bug in

Re: [PATCH] IBM Z: Remove match_scratch workaround

2021-06-01 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 6/1/2021 8:21 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x-redhat-linux. Ok for master? Since commit dd1ef00c45ba ("Fix bug in the define_subst handling that made match_scratch unusable for multi-alternative patterns.") the workaround for that bug in

[PATCH] IBM Z: Remove match_scratch workaround

2021-06-01 Thread Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches
Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x-redhat-linux. Ok for master? Since commit dd1ef00c45ba ("Fix bug in the define_subst handling that made match_scratch unusable for multi-alternative patterns.") the workaround for that bug in *ashrdi3_31 is not only no longer necessary, but actually breaks