Re: [PATCH] Import config.sub and config.guess from upstream.

2016-05-16 Thread Jeff Law
On 05/13/2016 01:55 AM, Jakub Sejdak wrote: +2016-05-13 Jakub Sejdak +* config.guess: Import version 2016-04-02 (newest). +* config.sub: Import version 2016-05-10 (newest). Installed on the trunk. I think this was NAK's for the release branches. jeff

Re: [PATCH] Import config.sub and config.guess from upstream.

2016-05-15 Thread Jakub Sejdak
Ping. 2016-05-14 13:36 GMT+02:00 Jakub Sejdak : > So please confirm that this is OK for trunk only and apply it. > Then I will start working on backporting this for other branches. > > 2016-05-14 11:29 GMT+02:00 Mike Stump : >> On May 14, 2016, at 1:15 AM, Jakub Sejdak wrote: >>> Then when those

Re: [PATCH] Import config.sub and config.guess from upstream.

2016-05-14 Thread Jakub Sejdak
So please confirm that this is OK for trunk only and apply it. Then I will start working on backporting this for other branches. 2016-05-14 11:29 GMT+02:00 Mike Stump : > On May 14, 2016, at 1:15 AM, Jakub Sejdak wrote: >> Then when those scripts get copied 'as they are' from GNU config? Only >>

Re: [PATCH] Import config.sub and config.guess from upstream.

2016-05-14 Thread Mike Stump
On May 14, 2016, at 1:15 AM, Jakub Sejdak wrote: > Then when those scripts get copied 'as they are' from GNU config? Only > for newly created branches? Only for trunk...

Re: [PATCH] Import config.sub and config.guess from upstream.

2016-05-14 Thread Jakub Sejdak
OK so just one final question to be clear: This patch was created from trunk with config,sub and config.guess copied from GNU config upstream. If you say, that I should just modify bits for my port, then this patch is still bad (since it modifies much more). Then when those scripts get copied 'as

Re: [PATCH] Import config.sub and config.guess from upstream.

2016-05-13 Thread Mike Stump
On May 13, 2016, at 11:50 AM, Jakub Sejdak wrote: > > OK I understand. So am I right, that in such a case there is no way to > introduce new OS targets to branch 4.9 and 5? No. You just hand edit in the bits you need for your port, and seek approval for that. In general, all new work goes int

Re: [PATCH] Import config.sub and config.guess from upstream.

2016-05-13 Thread Jakub Sejdak
OK I understand. So am I right, that in such a case there is no way to introduce new OS targets to branch 4.9 and 5? What about 6 branch and trunk? On the other hand: this is my first patch and I'm not quite familiar with the procedure of applying patches to upstream. Who should upload my patch, w

Re: [PATCH] Import config.sub and config.guess from upstream.

2016-05-13 Thread Joseph Myers
On Fri, 13 May 2016, Jakub Sejdak wrote: > Is it OK for trunk, gcc-4.9, gcc-5 and gcc-6 branches? It's not appropriate to update these scripts from upstream on release branches. For example, config.guess changed a while back to output x86_64-pc-linux-gnu in place of x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, a

Re: [PATCH] Import config.sub and config.guess from upstream.

2016-05-13 Thread Jakub Sejdak
Is it OK for trunk, gcc-4.9, gcc-5 and gcc-6 branches? 2016-05-13 9:52 GMT+02:00 Jakub Sejdak : > From: Kuba Sejdak > > --- > ChangeLog| 4 +++ > config.guess | 93 > > config.sub | 8 -- > 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+

[PATCH] Import config.sub and config.guess from upstream.

2016-05-13 Thread Jakub Sejdak
From: Kuba Sejdak --- ChangeLog| 4 +++ config.guess | 93 config.sub | 8 -- 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index eac1cc6..e092878 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/Change