On 24 Oct 19:14, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 05:44:44AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> > What I can see from config/atom.md:
> >> > ;; if palignr or psrldq
> >> > (define_insn_reservation "atom_sseishft_2" 1
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 05:44:44AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> > What I can see from config/atom.md:
>> > ;; if palignr or psrldq
>> > (define_insn_reservation "atom_sseishft_2" 1
>> > (and (eq_attr "cpu" "atom")
>> >
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 05:44:44AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > What I can see from config/atom.md:
> > ;; if palignr or psrldq
> > (define_insn_reservation "atom_sseishft_2" 1
> > (and (eq_attr "cpu" "atom")
> >(and (eq_attr "type" "sseishft")
> > (and (eq_attr "atom_unit"
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello Jakub, Uroš, Jakub
> On 04 Oct 21:35, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> The following patch tweaks the TImode vector shifts similarly
>> to the earlier vector shift patch, so that for shifts by immediate
>> we
Hello Jakub, Uroš, Jakub
On 04 Oct 21:35, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following patch tweaks the TImode vector shifts similarly
> to the earlier vector shift patch, so that for shifts by immediate
> we can accept a memory input. Additionally, it removes the vec_shl_*
> expander, because
On 10/4/17, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following patch tweaks the TImode vector shifts similarly
> to the earlier vector shift patch, so that for shifts by immediate
> we can accept a memory input. Additionally, it removes the vec_shl_*
I prefer 2 patches, a separate
Hi!
The following patch tweaks the TImode vector shifts similarly
to the earlier vector shift patch, so that for shifts by immediate
we can accept a memory input. Additionally, it removes the vec_shl_*
expander, because the middle-end has dropped that a few years ago,
and merges the left and