On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Resending in plain text mode so it goes through.
Teresa
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Any possibility of getting these patches (186979 and 186993), along with
r184891
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Resending in plain text mode so it goes through.
Teresa
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com
wrote:
Any
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
We have a splitter for reg1 = reg2 0x, but only if regnums
are different. But movl %edi, %edi is a cheaper variant of
andq $0x, %rdi even with the same register and doesn't clobber
flags, so this
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
We have a splitter for reg1 = reg2 0x, but only if regnums
are different. But movl %edi, %edi is a cheaper variant of
andq $0x,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 02:54:05PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
My recent changes to zero_extend expanders should handle this
automatically, and will undo generation of zero_extend pattern. Please
see zero_extendmodesi2_and expander, and how it handles
TARGET_ZERO_EXTEND_WITH_AND targets.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 02:54:05PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
My recent changes to zero_extend expanders should handle this
automatically, and will undo generation of zero_extend pattern. Please
see zero_extendmodesi2_and
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 02:54:05PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
My recent changes to zero_extend expanders should handle this
automatically, and will undo
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
We have a splitter for reg1 = reg2 0x, but only if regnums
are different. But movl %edi, %edi is a cheaper variant of
andq $0x, %rdi even with the same register and doesn't clobber
flags, so this patch
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:25:31PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
We have a splitter for reg1 = reg2 0x, but only if regnums
are different. But movl %edi, %edi is a cheaper variant of
andq $0x, %rdi even
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
We have a splitter for reg1 = reg2 0x, but only if regnums
are different. But movl %edi, %edi is a cheaper variant of
andq $0x, %rdi even with the same register and doesn't clobber
flags, so this
Hi!
We have a splitter for reg1 = reg2 0x, but only if regnums
are different. But movl %edi, %edi is a cheaper variant of
andq $0x, %rdi even with the same register and doesn't clobber
flags, so this patch attempts to expand it as a zero extension early.
Bootstrapped/regtested
On 04/25/12 12:14, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2012-04-25 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR target/53110
* config/i386/i386.md (andmode3): For andq $0x, reg
instead expand it as zero extension.
Ok.
r~
12 matches
Mail list logo
