Re: [PATCH] Improve splitX passes management

2020-02-08 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi again, On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 11:54:48AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:41 PM Segher Boessenkool > wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:13:35PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote: > > > The names of split_before_sched2 ("split4") and split_before_regstack > > > ("split3") do not

Re: [PATCH] Improve splitX passes management

2020-02-08 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:41 PM Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:13:35PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote: > > The names of split_before_sched2 ("split4") and split_before_regstack > > ("split3") do not reflect their insertion point in the sequence of passes, > > where

Re: [PATCH] Improve splitX passes management

2020-02-07 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:13:35PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote: > The names of split_before_sched2 ("split4") and split_before_regstack > ("split3") do not reflect their insertion point in the sequence of passes, > where split_before_regstack follows split_before_sched2. Reorder the code > and rename

[PATCH] Improve splitX passes management

2020-02-06 Thread Uros Bizjak
The names of split_before_sched2 ("split4") and split_before_regstack ("split3") do not reflect their insertion point in the sequence of passes, where split_before_regstack follows split_before_sched2. Reorder the code and rename the passes to reflect the reality. split_before_regstack pass does