On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/08/15 08:58, Kito Cheng wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jeff:
>>
>> After discussion with Bin, he prefer just use
>> gcc.c-torture/execute/scal-to-vec1.c
>> instead of introduce new one, do you have any further comment on this
>> patch?
>
> Ah, if there's an
On 01/08/15 08:58, Kito Cheng wrote:
Hi Jeff:
After discussion with Bin, he prefer just use
gcc.c-torture/execute/scal-to-vec1.c
instead of introduce new one, do you have any further comment on this patch?
Ah, if there's an existing test, then we certainly don't need a new one.
Jeff
On 01/08/15 08:58, Kito Cheng wrote:
Hi Jeff:
After discussion with Bin, he prefer just use
gcc.c-torture/execute/scal-to-vec1.c
instead of introduce new one, do you have any further comment on this patch?
If you can use the existing test, then that's good for me. I believe
that was the last q
Hi Jeff:
After discussion with Bin, he prefer just use
gcc.c-torture/execute/scal-to-vec1.c
instead of introduce new one, do you have any further comment on this patch?
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Kito Cheng wrote:
>> Hi Bin:
>>
>> It's 2 m
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Kito Cheng wrote:
> Hi Bin:
>
> It's 2 more line than gcc.c-torture/execute/scal-to-vec1.c since it's
> need specific compilation
> flag and specific target to reproduce this issue,
> and it's can't reproduce by normal testing flow with
> arm-*-linux-gnueabi (due to
Hi Bin:
It's 2 more line than gcc.c-torture/execute/scal-to-vec1.c since it's
need specific compilation
flag and specific target to reproduce this issue,
and it's can't reproduce by normal testing flow with
arm-*-linux-gnueabi (due to lack -fPIC flag),
so I prefer duplicate this case into gcc.targ
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Kito Cheng wrote:
> Hi Jeff:
>
> It's updated patch,bootstrapped and run regression tested on arm-eabi,
> arm-none-linux-uclibcgnueabi, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and nds32le-elf
> without introducing regression.
>
> Thanks for your review :)
>
> 2015-01-07 Kito Chen
Hi Jeff:
It's updated patch,bootstrapped and run regression tested on arm-eabi,
arm-none-linux-uclibcgnueabi, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and nds32le-elf
without introducing regression.
Thanks for your review :)
2015-01-07 Kito Cheng
PR target/64348
* lra-constraints.c (split_re
On 2015-01-05 8:40 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 2015-01-05 12:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/05/15 00:44, Kito Cheng wrote:
Hi Vladimir:
This patch has a discusses with you in May 2014, this patch is about
the caller-save register store an
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>
> On 2015-01-05 12:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 01/05/15 00:44, Kito Cheng wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Vladimir:
>>>This patch has a discusses with you in May 2014, this patch is about
>>> the caller-save register store and restore instruction
On 2015-01-05 12:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/05/15 00:44, Kito Cheng wrote:
Hi Vladimir:
This patch has a discusses with you in May 2014, this patch is about
the caller-save register store and restore instruction generation, the
current LRA implementation will miss caller-save store/restore
On 01/05/15 00:44, Kito Cheng wrote:
Hi Vladimir:
This patch has a discusses with you in May 2014, this patch is about
the caller-save register store and restore instruction generation, the
current LRA implementation will miss caller-save store/restore
instruction if need one more instruction.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Kito Cheng wrote:
> Hi Vladimir:
> This patch has a discusses with you in May 2014, this patch is about
> the caller-save register store and restore instruction generation, the
> current LRA implementation will miss caller-save store/restore
> instruction if need
Hi Vladimir:
This patch has a discusses with you in May 2014, this patch is about
the caller-save register store and restore instruction generation, the
current LRA implementation will miss caller-save store/restore
instruction if need one more instruction.
You said you will investigate for this
14 matches
Mail list logo
