在 2024/3/7 下午12:05, mengqinggang 写道:
Hi,
Thanks, this patch is LGTM.
I don't have a problem either.
Thanks.
在 2024/3/7 上午10:56, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:43 +0800, mengqinggang wrote:
Hi,
Whether to add an option to control the generation of R_LARCH_RELAX,
similar to as
Hi,
Thanks, this patch is LGTM.
在 2024/3/7 上午10:56, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:43 +0800, mengqinggang wrote:
Hi,
Whether to add an option to control the generation of R_LARCH_RELAX,
similar to as -mrelax/-mno-relax.
There are already -mrelax and -mno-relax, they can be checked
On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:43 +0800, mengqinggang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Whether to add an option to control the generation of R_LARCH_RELAX,
> similar to as -mrelax/-mno-relax.
There are already -mrelax and -mno-relax, they can be checked in the
compiler code with TARGET_LINKER_RELAXATION.
/* snip */
Hi,
Whether to add an option to control the generation of R_LARCH_RELAX,
similar to as -mrelax/-mno-relax.
在 2024/2/29 下午3:11, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
In Binutils we need to make IE to LE relaxation only allowed when there
is an R_LARCH_RELAX after R_LARCH_TLE_IE_PC_{HI20,LO12} so an invalid
"partial"
In Binutils we need to make IE to LE relaxation only allowed when there
is an R_LARCH_RELAX after R_LARCH_TLE_IE_PC_{HI20,LO12} so an invalid
"partial" relaxation won't happen with the extreme code model. So if we
are emitting %ie_pc_{hi20,lo12} in a non-extreme code model, emit an
R_LARCH_RELAX
