Re: [PATCH] Mark by_ref mem_ref in build_receiver_ref as non-trapping

2015-11-23 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 07:34:02PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: >> Mark by_ref mem_ref in build_receiver_ref as non-trapping >> >> 2015-11-21 Tom de Vries >> >> * omp-low.c

Re: [PATCH] Mark by_ref mem_ref in build_receiver_ref as non-trapping

2015-11-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:39:26AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 07:34:02PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > >> Mark by_ref mem_ref in build_receiver_ref as non-trapping > >> > >> 2015-11-21 Tom de

Re: [PATCH] Mark by_ref mem_ref in build_receiver_ref as non-trapping

2015-11-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 07:34:02PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > Mark by_ref mem_ref in build_receiver_ref as non-trapping > > 2015-11-21 Tom de Vries > > * omp-low.c (build_receiver_ref): Mark by_ref mem_ref as non-trapping. This is ok. > > --- > gcc/omp-low.c

[PATCH] Mark by_ref mem_ref in build_receiver_ref as non-trapping

2015-11-21 Thread Tom de Vries
[ was: Re: [Committed] Mark *.omp_data_i as non-trapping ] On 13/07/15 11:49, Tom de Vries wrote: [ was: Re: [gomp4, committed] Handle nested loops in kernels regions ] On 13/07/15 10:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:19:56AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: We rely on