Re: [PATCH] PR 99133, Mark xxspltiw, xxspltidp, and xxsplti32x as being prefixed

2021-02-19 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:44:14PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 06:09:39PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > Why test a p10 patch on a p8? > > Well it is just a code gen patch, so I can test it on any system, even an > x86_64 with a cross compiler. Given that right

Re: [PATCH] PR 99133, Mark xxspltiw, xxspltidp, and xxsplti32x as being prefixed

2021-02-18 Thread Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 06:09:39PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:17:30PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > > I noticed that the power10 xxspltiw, xxspltidp, and xxsplti32dx > > instructions are not flagged as prefixed instructions, which means the > >

Re: [PATCH] PR 99133, Mark xxspltiw, xxspltidp, and xxsplti32x as being prefixed

2021-02-17 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:17:30PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > I noticed that the power10 xxspltiw, xxspltidp, and xxsplti32dx > instructions are not flagged as prefixed instructions, which means the > instruction length is not set to 12 bytes. This patch sets these > instructions to be

[PATCH] PR 99133, Mark xxspltiw, xxspltidp, and xxsplti32x as being prefixed

2021-02-17 Thread Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches
PR 99133, Mark xxspltiw, xxspltidp, and xxsplti32x as being prefixed I noticed that the power10 xxspltiw, xxspltidp, and xxsplti32dx instructions are not flagged as prefixed instructions, which means the instruction length is not set to 12 bytes. This patch sets these instructions to be