On 03/08/2012 08:21 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
[Handle fix-up for level-reduced a template parameter pack]
In the partial instantiation of the member template A::f, the
level of the parameter pack Us is NOT reduced, even if it ought to be
considered as morally reduced.
The level of the paramete
Jason Merrill writes:
> On 03/08/2012 08:21 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> [Handle fix-up for level-reduced a template parameter pack]
>>
>> In the partial instantiation of the member template A::f, the
>> level of the parameter pack Us is NOT reduced, even if it ought to be
>> considered as morall
On 03/08/2012 08:21 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
So I needed to say somehow that the P in the pack expansion
(in the pattern) is actually a Pr "in spirit".
Ah, I see.
+/*we will fixup the siblings for
Space and capital W.
+get_root_index_same_level (tree i
Jason Merrill writes:
>> + /* This can happen for template parms of a template template
>> +parameter, e.g:
>> +
>> +template class TT> struct S;
>> +
>> +Consider the level of the parms of TT; T and U both have
>> +level 2; TT has no template parm of level 1
On 03/28/2012 11:02 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
For:
template class TT> struct S;
the parms of TT do have a level 1 that contains the parm T. It seems to
me that we need T and U to have different levels here, so both cannot
have level 1.
Why do we need them to have different levels? They
Jason Merrill writes:
> On 03/28/2012 11:02 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> For:
>>
>> template class TT> struct S;
>>
>> the parms of TT do have a level 1 that contains the parm T. It seems to
>> me that we need T and U to have different levels here, so both cannot
>> have level 1.
>
> Why do
On 03/28/2012 12:08 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
On 03/28/2012 11:02 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
template class TT> struct S;
Then, if U and T have the same level, how do we represent the full set
of template parms up to U for instance? I mean if that TREE_LIST of
parms still has two entries
