Aw: Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/102458 - ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

Hi Thomas, > > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline? > > It was actually 10.1.12 :-) dang, you're right. Steve had it right, and I failed miserably on copy I should fix the comment. > OK for trunk. > > Thanks for the patch! Thanks for the review, which came after Jerry's! I

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/102458 - ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

On 23.09.21 21:47, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: Dear Fortranners, we missed certain intrinsics as being disallowed in constant expressions, which lead to an ICE when these intrinsics were used in a specification expression with an initializer. The intrinsics in question are listed in

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/102458 - ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

Harald, Looks good. OK and thanks for your time and efforts. Jerry On 9/23/21 12:47 PM, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: Dear Fortranners, we missed certain intrinsics as being disallowed in constant expressions, which lead to an ICE when these intrinsics were used in a specification

[PATCH] PR fortran/102458 - ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

Dear Fortranners, we missed certain intrinsics as being disallowed in constant expressions, which lead to an ICE when these intrinsics were used in a specification expression with an initializer. The intrinsics in question are listed in F2018:10.1.2. As discussed in the PR, Steve recommended to