On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 07:37:44PM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> This patch does not fix PR 83344, but merely fixes an error where we
> used to set a constant character length value from a non-constant
> expression, and thus set it to some bogus value.
>
> As a result of this, I have commented o
This patch does not fix PR 83344, but merely fixes an error where we
used to set a constant character length value from a non-constant
expression, and thus set it to some bogus value.
As a result of this, I have commented out part of the associate_22.f90
test which otherwise generates a warning me
