Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/98307 - Dependency check fails when using "allocatable"

2020-12-17 Thread Thomas Koenig via Gcc-patches
Hi Harald, OK for master? Since we generate wrong code under the given circumstances, what do people think about backports? OK for master. The patch is also simple enough that the risk of regressions is almost nil, so backports are also OK. Best regards Thomas

[PATCH] PR fortran/98307 - Dependency check fails when using "allocatable"

2020-12-16 Thread Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches
Dear all, since the introduction of check_forall_dependencies() we mishandled the dependencies of ALLOCATABLE components of derived types, while POINTER was dealt with. Fix that. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for master? Since we generate wrong code under the given circumstances, what