On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:14:37AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Or is double-double considered dead format that will hopefully soon go
> away, not worth spending more time on?
It won't go away soon, but I think we should treat it as legacy format.
Currently, to use ieee128 you need either hardwa
> On 9 Jan 2019, at 10:14, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 09:37:40AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> The IBM128 long double format isn't foldable in constant expressions, so
>> conditionally skip the std::complex cases when they'll
>> fail.
>>
>> PR libstdc++/88204
>>
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 09:37:40AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> The IBM128 long double format isn't foldable in constant expressions, so
> conditionally skip the std::complex cases when they'll
> fail.
>
> PR libstdc++/88204
> * testsuite/26_numerics/complex/operators/more_constexpr
The IBM128 long double format isn't foldable in constant expressions, so
conditionally skip the std::complex cases when they'll
fail.
PR libstdc++/88204
* testsuite/26_numerics/complex/operators/more_constexpr.cc: Do not
test std::complex if long double format is IBM128.