On 11/08/20 10:11 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 27/12/19 11:57 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Here is the patch to extend DR 526 to forward_list and list
remove_if and unique.
As the adopted pattern is simpler I also applied it to the remove methods.
   PR libstdc++/91620
   *
On 27/12/19 11:57 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Here is the patch to extend DR 526 to forward_list and list remove_if
and unique.
As the adopted pattern is simpler I also applied it to the remove methods.
   PR libstdc++/91620
   * include/bits/forward_list.tcc
Gentle reminder, this time with tests.
I've added one for list::remove cause I think there was none, for
forward_list we had remove_freed.cc.
I added
// { dg-options "-g -O0" }
in the new tests otherwise it doesn't fail, that's life with UB. I know
that it can pass also with those options.
On 03/03/20 21:32 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 03/03/20 06:42 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Isn't it something to fix before gcc 10 release ?
No, I don't think so. It's not a regression.
(And is not experimental C++20 stuff, and is not just changing tests
or docs).
On 03/03/20 06:42 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Isn't it something to fix before gcc 10 release ?
No, I don't think so. It's not a regression.
Hi
Isn't it something to fix before gcc 10 release ?
François
On 12/27/19 11:57 AM, François Dumont wrote:
Here is the patch to extend DR 526 to forward_list and list remove_if
and unique.
As the adopted pattern is simpler I also applied it to the remove
methods.
PR
Here is the patch to extend DR 526 to forward_list and list remove_if
and unique.
As the adopted pattern is simpler I also applied it to the remove methods.
PR libstdc++/91620
* include/bits/forward_list.tcc (forward_list<>::remove): Collect nodes
to destroy in an intermediate
