> So the fix is a one-liner that sets subst_low_luid before the
> expand_field_assignment() call. Bootstrapped and tested under i686,
> x86-64, powerpc64. Cross-tested on ARM. I was a bit weary that some
> optimization regression might appear, which will complicate things, but
> everything looks fi
Hi,
As described in the PR, a testcase compiled for PowerPC:
struct S {
unsigned a : 30;
unsigned b : 2;
};
int foo (int b)
{
struct S s = {0};
s.b = b;
return bar (0x000b0010, 0x00040100ULL, *(unsigned long *)&s);
}
currently this is compiled to:
foo:
lis 6,0x4
li 5,0
