Hi!
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 07:00:11PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
> @@ -4131,8 +4131,13 @@ rs6000_option_override_internal (bool global_init_p)
>
>/* Use long double size to select the appropriate long double. We use
| Subject: [PATCH] PowerPC: Set long double size for IBM/IEEE.
| Message-ID: <2020112011.ga...@ibm-toto.the-meissners.org>
| https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559660.html
--
Michael Meissner, IBM
IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-6245, USA
email:
I haven't received a replay for this patch:
| Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 19:00:11 -0500
| Subject: [PATCH] PowerPC: Set long double size for IBM/IEEE.
| Message-ID: <2020112011.ga...@ibm-toto.the-meissners.org>
| https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559660.html
--
M
[PATCH] PowerPC: Set long double size for IBM/IEEE.
I originally posted this patch to an internal IBM mailing list instead of
gcc-patches.
As I was working with compilers where the long double default was 64-bit, it
became annoying to have to use two options to switch to one of the 128-bit long
