On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Carrot Wei wrote:
>
> Hi Jakub
>
> I have run it on 4.6, it passes the following testing:
>
> x86-64 bootstrap
> x86-64 regression test
> regression test on arm qemu
>
> Is it OK for gcc4.6?
>
> Ahmad, is it OK for google/gcc-4_6/ and google/gcc-4_6-mobile ?
Yes,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:39:43AM -0700, Carrot Wei wrote:
> I have run it on 4.6, it passes the following testing:
>
> x86-64 bootstrap
> x86-64 regression test
> regression test on arm qemu
>
> Is it OK for gcc4.6?
Yes.
Jakub
Hi Jakub
I have run it on 4.6, it passes the following testing:
x86-64 bootstrap
x86-64 regression test
regression test on arm qemu
Is it OK for gcc4.6?
Ahmad, is it OK for google/gcc-4_6/ and google/gcc-4_6-mobile ?
thanks
Carrot
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Carrot Wei wrote:
> Hi Jakub
Hi Jakub
The same problem also affects gcc4.6,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54398. Could this be
ported to 4.6 branch?
thanks
Carrot
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:21:38PM +, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> > Alias analysis by
On 02/13/2012 11:54 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> * cselib.c (expand_loc): Return sp, fp, hfp or cfa base reg right
> away if seen.
Looks good.
r~
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:21:38PM +, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> Alias analysis by DSE based on CSELIB expansion assumes that
> references to the stack frame from different base registers (ie FP, SP)
> never alias.
>
> The comment block in cselib explains that cselib does not allow
> substituti
Alias analysis by DSE based on CSELIB expansion assumes that
references to the stack frame from different base registers (ie FP, SP)
never alias.
The comment block in cselib explains that cselib does not allow
substitution of FP, SP or SFP specifically in order not to break DSE.
However, the log
