Hi!
Resending this email. Seems some spam filter ate it due to the many
email addresses...
Following up on my suggestion to put all email addresses into <...>
(cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-09/msg00298.html) here's an
actual patch. Quite a mechanical change, along with a few clean-ups of
s
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:10:00PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Resending this email. Seems some spam filter ate it due to the many
> email addresses...
Will now all/most/many further patches to MAINTAINERS hit spam filters
as well?
Segher
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:10:00PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>> Resending this email. Seems some spam filter ate it due to the many
>> email addresses...
>
> Will now all/most/many further patches to MAINTAINERS hit spam filters
> a
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 03:14:16PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:10:00PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> >> Resending this email. Seems some spam filter ate it due to the many
> >> email addresses...
> >
>
On 09/25/14 15:10, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Hi!
Resending this email. Seems some spam filter ate it due to the many
email addresses...
Following up on my suggestion to put all email addresses into <...>
(cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-09/msg00298.html) here's an
actual patch. Quite a mech