s/tiny/small/ and I think we might be getting close. So the 403.gcc test being
compiled contains:
if (regno == PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM
fixed_regs[PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM])
return pic_offset_table_rtx;
PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM is an expression testing machine flags; prior to
Well, I haven't looked into this in detail: I've gone only as far as
* swapping emit-rtl.o between 'good' compiles (svn r214042) and 'bad'
compiles (r214043), finding that the critical difference is in the emit-rtl.o
generated by r214043;
*looking at the relocations in the 'bad' emit_rtl.o,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
Well, I haven't looked into this in detail: I've gone only as far as
* swapping emit-rtl.o between 'good' compiles (svn r214042) and 'bad'
compiles (r214043), finding that the critical difference is in the
emit-rtl.o
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
Well, I haven't looked into this in detail: I've gone only as far as
* swapping emit-rtl.o between 'good' compiles (svn r214042) and 'bad'
compiles (r214043), finding that the critical difference is in the
emit-rtl.o
We've been seeing errors using aarch64-none-linux-gnu gcc to build the 403.gcc
benchmark from spec2k6, that we've traced back to this patch. The error looks like:
/home/alalaw01/bootstrap_richie/gcc/xgcc -B/home/alalaw01/bootstrap_richie/gcc
-O3 -mcpu=cortex-a57.cortex-a53 -DSPEC_CPU_LP64
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
We've been seeing errors using aarch64-none-linux-gnu gcc to build the
403.gcc benchmark from spec2k6, that we've traced back to this patch. The
error looks like:
/home/alalaw01/bootstrap_richie/gcc/xgcc
The following makes tree_swap_operands_p put all constants 2nd place,
also looks through sign-changes when considering further canonicalzations
and removes the odd -Os guard for those. That was put in with
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-10/msg01208.html just
motivated by CSiBE numbers -
On 15 August 2014 11:07, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
- if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == INTEGER_CST)
+ if (CONSTANT_CLASS_P (arg1) == INTEGER_CST)
Huh?
/* Nonzero if NODE represents a constant. */
#define CONSTANT_CLASS_P(NODE)\
(TREE_CODE_CLASS (TREE_CODE (NODE)) == tcc_constant)
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
On 15 August 2014 11:07, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
- if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == INTEGER_CST)
+ if (CONSTANT_CLASS_P (arg1) == INTEGER_CST)
Huh?
Eh ;)
/* Nonzero if NODE represents a constant. */
#define
Am 15.08.2014 um 11:32 schrieb Manuel López-Ibáñez:
On 15 August 2014 11:07, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
- if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == INTEGER_CST)
+ if (CONSTANT_CLASS_P (arg1) == INTEGER_CST)
Huh?
/* Nonzero if NODE represents a constant. */
#define CONSTANT_CLASS_P(NODE)\
On 15 August 2014 14:43, Franz Sirl franz.sirl-ker...@lauterbach.com wrote:
Am 15.08.2014 um 11:32 schrieb Manuel López-Ibáñez:
On 15 August 2014 11:07, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
- if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == INTEGER_CST)
+ if (CONSTANT_CLASS_P (arg1) == INTEGER_CST)
Huh?
/*
11 matches
Mail list logo
