I realized we missed this on trunk, and I need this on adding -mcpu
for sfive cores, so I'm gonna push this to trunk.
Most concerns are around the assembler stuff, so I believe it's less
controversial on the toolchain driver side.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 6:01 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
> On Tue,
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:50:28 PST (-0800), jeffreya...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/22/22 08:29, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 07:20:15 PST (-0800), jeffreya...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/20/22 18:36, Kito Cheng wrote:
So the idea here is just to define the extension so that it gets
On 11/22/22 08:29, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 07:20:15 PST (-0800), jeffreya...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/20/22 18:36, Kito Cheng wrote:
So the idea here is just to define the extension so that it gets
defined
in the ISA strings and passed through to the assembler, right?
That
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 07:20:15 PST (-0800), jeffreya...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/20/22 18:36, Kito Cheng wrote:
So the idea here is just to define the extension so that it gets defined
in the ISA strings and passed through to the assembler, right?
That will also define arch test marco:
On 11/20/22 18:36, Kito Cheng wrote:
So the idea here is just to define the extension so that it gets defined
in the ISA strings and passed through to the assembler, right?
That will also define arch test marco:
> So the idea here is just to define the extension so that it gets defined
> in the ISA strings and passed through to the assembler, right?
That will also define arch test marco:
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/blob/master/riscv-c-api.md#architecture-extension-test-macro
On
On 11/8/22 20:00, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
These extensions were recently frozen [1]. As per Andrew's post [2]
we're meant to ignore these in software, this just adds them to the list
of allowed extensions and otherwise ignores them. I added these under
SPEC_CLASS_NONE even though the PDF lists
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:14:18 PST (-0800), christoph.muell...@vrull.eu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 4:01 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
These extensions were recently frozen [1]. As per Andrew's post [2]
we're meant to ignore these in software, this just adds them to the list
of allowed extensions
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 4:01 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> These extensions were recently frozen [1]. As per Andrew's post [2]
> we're meant to ignore these in software, this just adds them to the list
> of allowed extensions and otherwise ignores them. I added these under
> SPEC_CLASS_NONE even
These extensions were recently frozen [1]. As per Andrew's post [2]
we're meant to ignore these in software, this just adds them to the list
of allowed extensions and otherwise ignores them. I added these under
SPEC_CLASS_NONE even though the PDF lists them as 20190614 because it
seems pointless
10 matches
Mail list logo
