On 5/26/23 03:00, Feng Wang wrote:
Ping, I will rebase if the change is fine to you, thanks!
Not forgotten. I think Palmer owns this from a review standpoint.
We're tracking RISC-V specific patches here:
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/?series=&submitter=&state=&q=RISC-
Ping, I will rebase if the change is fine to you, thanks!
On 2023-03-01 09:46 Feng Wang wrote:
>
>The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more
>and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask
>flag, please refer to the below case:
>There are some new MA
On 2023-03-01 09:46 Feng Wang wrote:
>
>The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more
>and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask
>flag, please refer to the below case:
>There are some new MASK flags for 'v' extension(ZVL32B,ZVL64B,...,ZVL65536B),
>b
On 2023-03-03 17:12 Feng Wang wrote:
>
>On 2023-03-03 16:54 jiawei wrote:
>>
>>The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more
>>and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask
>>flag, please refer to the below case:
>>There are some new MASK flags for 'v'
On 2023-03-03 16:54 jiawei wrote:
>
>The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more
>and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask
>flag, please refer to the below case:
>There are some new MASK flags for 'v' extension(ZVL32B,ZVL64B,...,ZVL65536B),
>but
> The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more> and
> more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask> flag, please
> refer to the below case:> There are some new MASK flags for 'v'
> extension(ZVL32B,ZVL64B,...,ZVL65536B),> but these MASK flags can't stor
The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more
and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask
flag, please refer to the below case:
There are some new MASK flags for 'v' extension(ZVL32B,ZVL64B,...,ZVL65536B),
but these MASK flags can't store into x_target
The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more
and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask
flag, please refer to the below case:
There are some new MASK flags for 'v' extension(ZVL32B,ZVL64B,...,ZVL65536B),
but these MASK flags can't store into x_target