Re: [Ping][PATCH] RISC-V: Optimize the MASK opt generation

2023-05-26 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 5/26/23 03:00, Feng Wang wrote: Ping, I will rebase if the change is fine to you, thanks! Not forgotten. I think Palmer owns this from a review standpoint. We're tracking RISC-V specific patches here: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/?series=&submitter=&state=&q=RISC-

[Ping][PATCH] RISC-V: Optimize the MASK opt generation

2023-05-26 Thread Feng Wang
Ping, I will rebase if the change is fine to you, thanks! On 2023-03-01 09:46  Feng Wang wrote: > >The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more >and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask >flag, please refer to the below case: >There are some new MA

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Optimize the MASK opt generation

2023-05-26 Thread Feng Wang
On 2023-03-01 09:46  Feng Wang wrote: > >The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more >and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask >flag, please refer to the below case: >There are some new MASK flags for 'v' extension(ZVL32B,ZVL64B,...,ZVL65536B), >b

Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Optimize the MASK opt generation

2023-03-05 Thread Feng Wang
On 2023-03-03 17:12  Feng Wang wrote: > >On 2023-03-03 16:54  jiawei wrote: >> >>The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more >>and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask >>flag, please refer to the below case: >>There are some new MASK flags for 'v'

Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Optimize the MASK opt generation

2023-03-03 Thread Feng Wang
On 2023-03-03 16:54  jiawei wrote: > >The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more >and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask >flag, please refer to the below case: >There are some new MASK flags for 'v' extension(ZVL32B,ZVL64B,...,ZVL65536B), >but

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Optimize the MASK opt generation

2023-03-03 Thread jiawei
> The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more> and > more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask> flag, please > refer to the below case:> There are some new MASK flags for 'v' > extension(ZVL32B,ZVL64B,...,ZVL65536B),> but these MASK flags can't stor

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Optimize the MASK opt generation

2023-03-03 Thread jiawei
The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask flag, please refer to the below case: There are some new MASK flags for 'v' extension(ZVL32B,ZVL64B,...,ZVL65536B), but these MASK flags can't store into x_target

[PATCH] RISC-V: Optimize the MASK opt generation

2023-02-28 Thread Feng Wang
The Mask flag in the single TargetVariable is not enough due to more and more extensions were added.So I optimize the defination of Mask flag, please refer to the below case: There are some new MASK flags for 'v' extension(ZVL32B,ZVL64B,...,ZVL65536B), but these MASK flags can't store into x_target