On 11/17/22 21:53, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 14:44:31 PST (-0800), jeffreya...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/8/22 12:55, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
If we are testing a register or a paradoxical subreg (i.e. anything
that is not
a partial subreg) for equality/non-equality with zero, we c
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 at 05:53, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 14:44:31 PST (-0800), jeffreya...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > On 11/8/22 12:55, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> >> If we are testing a register or a paradoxical subreg (i.e. anything that
> >> is not
> >> a partial subreg) for equa
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 14:44:31 PST (-0800), jeffreya...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/8/22 12:55, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
If we are testing a register or a paradoxical subreg (i.e. anything that is not
a partial subreg) for equality/non-equality with zero, we can generate a branch
that compares against $
On 11/8/22 12:55, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
If we are testing a register or a paradoxical subreg (i.e. anything that is not
a partial subreg) for equality/non-equality with zero, we can generate a branch
that compares against $zero. This will work for QI, HI, SI and DImode, so we
enable this for
If we are testing a register or a paradoxical subreg (i.e. anything that is not
a partial subreg) for equality/non-equality with zero, we can generate a branch
that compares against $zero. This will work for QI, HI, SI and DImode, so we
enable this for ANYI.
2020-08-30 gcc/ChangeLog:
*
