On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:15:46AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 02.12.17 at 01:13, wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 02:54:28PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> Will try this:
> >
> > That failed to bootstrap, but here is an updated version that passed
> > bootstrap/regtest on x86_64-linux
>>> On 02.12.17 at 01:13, wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 02:54:28PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> Will try this:
>
> That failed to bootstrap, but here is an updated version that passed
> bootstrap/regtest on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
Thanks for the quick fix. A related quest
On 02 Dec 01:13, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 02:54:28PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Will try this:
>
> That failed to bootstrap, but here is an updated version that passed
> bootstrap/regtest on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
Great. OK.
--
Thanks, K
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 02:54:28PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Will try this:
That failed to bootstrap, but here is an updated version that passed
bootstrap/regtest on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2017-12-01 Jakub Jelinek
* config/i386/i386-protos.h (standard_sse_const
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:18:43PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Furthermore this
> >
> > typedef double __attribute__((vector_size(16))) v2df_t;
> > typedef double __attribute__((vector_size(32))) v4df_t;
> >
> > void test1(void) {
> > register v2df_t x asm("xmm31") = {};
> > asm volat
