On 11/19/21 15:06, Richard Biener wrote:
Can you please revert it?
Sure, done as 79e9f721d1a6f370ce0534745baeeb5a56da948e.
Martin
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 2:22 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 11/19/21 09:59, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > So I find the abstraction useful. However, I don't have plans to add
> > other kinds of debug stmts, and I don't know of anyone else who does, so
> > I won't stand in the way if others think
On 11/19/21 09:59, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
So I find the abstraction useful. However, I don't have plans to add
other kinds of debug stmts, and I don't know of anyone else who does, so
I won't stand in the way if others think removing these abstractions is
a positive change.
Hello.
I've
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 10:38:41AM +0100, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Yup. Though there is a 1:1 equivalence right now, conceptually other
> > kinds of debug marker stmts, and of debug bind stmts, could be
> > introduced, and then the macros would be adjusted to encompass the new
>
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 9:59 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Oct 18, 2021, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:54 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> The macros correspond 1:1 to an option flags and make it harder
> >> to find all usages of the flags.
> >>
>
On Oct 18, 2021, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:54 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> The macros correspond 1:1 to an option flags and make it harder
>> to find all usages of the flags.
>>
>> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
On 11/12/2021 7:37 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
@Alexandre: PING
On 10/18/21 12:05, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:54 AM Martin Liška wrote:
The macros correspond 1:1 to an option flags and make it harder
to find all usages of the flags.
Patch can bootstrap on
@Alexandre: PING
On 10/18/21 12:05, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:54 AM Martin Liška wrote:
The macros correspond 1:1 to an option flags and make it harder
to find all usages of the flags.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:54 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> The macros correspond 1:1 to an option flags and make it harder
> to find all usages of the flags.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>
> Ready to be installed?
Hmm, they were introduced on purpose -
The macros correspond 1:1 to an option flags and make it harder
to find all usages of the flags.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
* c-gimplify.c (genericize_c_loop): Use option
10 matches
Mail list logo
