Since Jeff says that the latest Fedora build went fine, we can safely
remove the duplicated code in vr_values.
Here is the original proposal rebased for latest trunk.
Tested on x86-64 Linux.
Pushed.
commit 82b6d25d289195d41e53fc91f63325864e3e28d0
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date: Wed Oct 28 16:
On 11/14/20 1:05 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Any news on the latest snapshot? Can we remove the duplicate range
> built-in code?
11-08 looks real good, best we've had since mid-sept.
jeff
Any news on the latest snapshot? Can we remove the duplicate range built-in
code?
Aldy
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020, 22:43 Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 11/5/20 2:40 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > I'll wait for the 11/01 snapshot to finish then.
>
> I'm worried that the 11/01 snapshot is going to generate so ma
Ug. Well, we need to wait for something later than the 25th's snapshot
since I committed the asset patch later.
Aldy
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020, 22:43 Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 11/5/20 2:40 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > I'll wait for the 11/01 snapshot to finish then.
>
> I'm worried that the 11/01 s
On 11/5/20 2:40 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> I'll wait for the 11/01 snapshot to finish then.
I'm worried that the 11/01 snapshot is going to generate so many
failures that it may not be useful. I'm not sure what's going on, but
I'm getting a ton of what appear to be codegen correctness issues.
I'll wait for the 11/01 snapshot to finish then.
Thanks.
Aldy
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020, 21:53 Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 10/20/20 10:43 AM, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > As promised.
> >
> > Now that we know the vr_values and ranger versions are in sync, it
> > is safe to remove the vr_value
On 10/20/20 10:43 AM, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
> As promised.
>
> Now that we know the vr_values and ranger versions are in sync, it
> is safe to remove the vr_values version and just call the ranger one.
>
> I am holding off on pushing this for a week or two, or until Fedora gets
>
On 10/20/20 12:43 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
As promised.
Now that we know the vr_values and ranger versions are in sync, it
is safe to remove the vr_values version and just call the ranger one.
I am holding off on pushing this for a week or two, or until Fedora gets
rebuilt with the current com
As promised.
Now that we know the vr_values and ranger versions are in sync, it
is safe to remove the vr_values version and just call the ranger one.
I am holding off on pushing this for a week or two, or until Fedora gets
rebuilt with the current compiler.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* vr-values.h
