On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 8:27 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/2/2022 2:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 7:41 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >> Ping
> > I didn't quite get Jeffs comment, so I waited (sorry). I've meanwhile added
> Sorry. IIRC the concern was whether or not we n
On 2/2/2022 2:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 7:41 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Ping
I didn't quite get Jeffs comment, so I waited (sorry). I've meanwhile added
Sorry. IIRC the concern was whether or not we need to do something
special for irreducible regions. In that ca
Hello,
On Fri, Jan 21 2022, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
> As discussed in PR103721, the problem here is that we are crossing a
> backedge and causing us to use relations from a previous iteration of a
> loop.
>
> This handles the testcases in both PR103721 and PR104067 which are variants
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 7:41 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
> Ping
I didn't quite get Jeffs comment, so I waited (sorry). I've meanwhile added
extern bool mark_dfs_back_edges (struct function *);
so please make verify_mark_backedges take a struct function * and replace
'cfun' with the explicit argu
Ping
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022, 20:20 Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 9:51 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 1:12 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:56 AM Richard Biener
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:30
On 1/21/2022 3:29 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:43 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 9:30 AM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
wrote:
As discussed in PR103721, the problem here is that we are crossing a
backedge and causing us to use relations from a prev
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 9:51 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 1:12 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:56 AM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:30 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:43 AM
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 1:12 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:56 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:30 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:43 AM Richard Biener
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 9:30
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:56 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:30 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:43 AM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 9:30 AM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As discuss
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:30 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:43 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 9:30 AM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > As discussed in PR103721, the problem here is that we are crossing a
> > > backedge an
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:43 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 9:30 AM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > As discussed in PR103721, the problem here is that we are crossing a
> > backedge and causing us to use relations from a previous iteration of a
> > loop.
> >
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 9:30 AM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> As discussed in PR103721, the problem here is that we are crossing a
> backedge and causing us to use relations from a previous iteration of a
> loop.
>
> This handles the testcases in both PR103721 and PR104067 which are va
As discussed in PR103721, the problem here is that we are crossing a
backedge and causing us to use relations from a previous iteration of a
loop.
This handles the testcases in both PR103721 and PR104067 which are variants
of the same thing.
Tested on x86-64 Linux with the usual regstrap as well
13 matches
Mail list logo
