On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 05:43:13PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > If the predicates are supposed to ensure it, then I think the assert is
> > fine.
>
> Is it guaranteed that the predicate conditions are evaluated
> before executing the conditions?
Yes. You can see it in insn-recog.c...
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 05:33:18PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 05:11:27PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > The patch fixes the s390x crash reported in PR 79240:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240
> > Regression tested and bootstrapped on s390x biarch and
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 05:11:27PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> The patch fixes the s390x crash reported in PR 79240:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240
> Regression tested and bootstrapped on s390x biarch and s390.
> gcc/ChangeLog-pr79240
>
> PR target/79240
> *
240
* gcc.target/s390/pr79240.c: New test.
>From 0c9bc9c84a98c90df54c58dbdc299e064b3a9c5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dominik Vogt <v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:50:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] S/390: PR target/79240: Fix assertion in
s390_extzv_shift_ok.
