On 1/31/23 18:21, Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches wrote:
For bool values, it is easier to deal with
xor 1 rather than having 1 - a. This is because
we are more likely to simplify the xor further in many
cases.
This is a special case for (MASK - b) where MASK
is a powerof2 - 1 and b <= MASK but
On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 2:30 AM Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> For bool values, it is easier to deal with
> xor 1 rather than having 1 - a. This is because
> we are more likely to simplify the xor further in many
> cases.
>
> This is a special case for (MASK - b) where MASK
> is a
For bool values, it is easier to deal with
xor 1 rather than having 1 - a. This is because
we are more likely to simplify the xor further in many
cases.
This is a special case for (MASK - b) where MASK
is a powerof2 - 1 and b <= MASK but only for bool
ranges ([0,1]) as that is the main case where
For bool values, it is easier to deal with
xor 1 rather than having 1 - a. This is because
we are more likely to simplify the xor further in many
cases.
This is a special case for (MASK - b) where MASK
is a powerof2 - 1 and b <= MASK but only for bool
ranges ([0,1]) as that is the main case where
