> Thanks for catching this. Also the comment at the top can now mention
> the now-available constraint letter as well.
Ah, yes. And doc/md.texi be adjusted accordingly.
--
Eric Botcazou
From: Eric Botcazou
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:40:08 +0200
>> While playing around with LRA on sparc I noticed that we had some
>> poorly formed target memory constraints on sparc.
>>
>> In particular, they were not using define_memory_constraint, so we
>> would not get a true return from EXTRA_M
> While playing around with LRA on sparc I noticed that we had some
> poorly formed target memory constraints on sparc.
>
> In particular, they were not using define_memory_constraint, so we
> would not get a true return from EXTRA_MEMORY_CONSTRAINT for them.
>
> Also, these were matching 'reg' o
While playing around with LRA on sparc I noticed that we had some
poorly formed target memory constraints on sparc.
In particular, they were not using define_memory_constraint, so we
would not get a true return from EXTRA_MEMORY_CONSTRAINT for them.
Also, these were matching 'reg' objects for sp