Re: [PATCH] Use define_memory_constraint on sparc when necessary.

2012-10-26 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Thanks for catching this. Also the comment at the top can now mention > the now-available constraint letter as well. Ah, yes. And doc/md.texi be adjusted accordingly. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: [PATCH] Use define_memory_constraint on sparc when necessary.

2012-10-26 Thread David Miller
From: Eric Botcazou Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:40:08 +0200 >> While playing around with LRA on sparc I noticed that we had some >> poorly formed target memory constraints on sparc. >> >> In particular, they were not using define_memory_constraint, so we >> would not get a true return from EXTRA_M

Re: [PATCH] Use define_memory_constraint on sparc when necessary.

2012-10-26 Thread Eric Botcazou
> While playing around with LRA on sparc I noticed that we had some > poorly formed target memory constraints on sparc. > > In particular, they were not using define_memory_constraint, so we > would not get a true return from EXTRA_MEMORY_CONSTRAINT for them. > > Also, these were matching 'reg' o

[PATCH] Use define_memory_constraint on sparc when necessary.

2012-10-23 Thread David Miller
While playing around with LRA on sparc I noticed that we had some poorly formed target memory constraints on sparc. In particular, they were not using define_memory_constraint, so we would not get a true return from EXTRA_MEMORY_CONSTRAINT for them. Also, these were matching 'reg' objects for sp