On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 07:05:02PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 05:52:29PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > If you write:
> >
> > paddi 10,9,foo@pcrel
> >
> > The assembler will interpret this as:
> >
> > paddi 10,9,(.-foo),0
foo-. actually.
> > I.e. it
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 05:52:29PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 06:52:42PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 05:51:14PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > > In some of my previous work, I had make a mistake forgetting that the
> > > PADDI
> >
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 06:52:42PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 05:51:14PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > In some of my previous work, I had make a mistake forgetting that the PADDI
> > instruction did not allow adding a PC-relative reference to a register (you
>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 05:51:14PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> In some of my previous work, I had make a mistake forgetting that the PADDI
> instruction did not allow adding a PC-relative reference to a register (you
> can
> either load up a PC-relative address without adding a register, or y
In some of my previous work, I had make a mistake forgetting that the PADDI
instruction did not allow adding a PC-relative reference to a register (you can
either load up a PC-relative address without adding a register, or you can add
a register to a constant). The assembler allowed the instructio
