This patch adds the attribute `type` to most SVE1 instructions, as in the other
instructions.
--
Evandro Menezes
0002-aarch64-Add-SVE-instruction-types.patch
Description: Binary data
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 10:01 AM
> To: Evandro Menezes via Gcc-patches
> Cc: evandro+...@gcc.gnu.org; Evandro Menezes ;
> Kyrylo Tkachov ; Tamar Christina
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Add SVE instru
Hi, Richard.
My criteria were very much (a). In some cases though, a particular instruction
could have variations that others in its natural group didn’t, when if seemed
sensible to create a specific description for this instruction, even if its
base form shares resources with other instructio
.gnu.org>>
>> Cc: evandro+...@gcc.gnu.org <mailto:evandro+...@gcc.gnu.org>; Evandro
>> Menezes mailto:ebah...@icloud.com>>;
>> Kyrylo Tkachov mailto:kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>>;
>> Tamar Christina
>> mailto:tamar.christ...@arm.com>>
>> Subj
Sandiford ; Evandro Menezes via
Gcc-patches ; evandro+...@gcc.gnu.org; Tamar Christina
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Add SVE instruction types
Hi, Kyrill.
I wasn’t aware of your previous patch. Could you clarify why you considered
creating an SVE specific type attribute instead of reusing the
t;
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford <mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com>>
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 10:01 AM
> To: Evandro Menezes via Gcc-patches <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>>
> Cc: evandro+...@gcc.gnu.org <mailto:evandro+...@gcc.
Evandro Menezes via Gcc-patches writes:
> This patch adds the attribute `type` to most SVE1 instructions, as in the
> other
> instructions.
Thanks for doing this.
Could you say what criteria you used for picking the granularity? Other
maintainers might disagree, but personally I'd prefer to di
: Evandro Menezes
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 9:13 PM
> To: Kyrylo Tkachov
> Cc: Richard Sandiford ; Evandro Menezes via
> Gcc-patches ; evandro+...@gcc.gnu.org; Tamar
> Christina
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Add SVE instruction types
>
> Hi, Kyrill.
>
> I was