On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 5:36 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 3/12/19 2:20 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:16 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>
> >> A -Warray-bounds enhancement committed last year into GCC 9
> >> introduced an assumption that the MEM_REF type argument has
> >> a
On 3/12/19 2:20 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:16 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
A -Warray-bounds enhancement committed last year into GCC 9
introduced an assumption that the MEM_REF type argument has
a size. The test case submitted in PR89662 does pointer
addition on void*, in
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:16 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> A -Warray-bounds enhancement committed last year into GCC 9
> introduced an assumption that the MEM_REF type argument has
> a size. The test case submitted in PR89662 does pointer
> addition on void*, in which the MEM_REF type is void*,
A -Warray-bounds enhancement committed last year into GCC 9
introduced an assumption that the MEM_REF type argument has
a size. The test case submitted in PR89662 does pointer
addition on void*, in which the MEM_REF type is void*, which
breaks the assumption.
The attached change removes this