On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When adding checks in which case not to merge a VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR from
> large/huge _BitInt to vector/complex etc., I missed the case of loads.
> Those are handled differently later.
> Anyway, I think the load case is something we can handle
Hi!
When adding checks in which case not to merge a VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR from
large/huge _BitInt to vector/complex etc., I missed the case of loads.
Those are handled differently later.
Anyway, I think the load case is something we can handle just fine,
so the following patch does that instead of
