Hi David.
OK. Thanks.
> The test was trying to do too much by both checking for an error, and
> checking the resulting assembly. Of course, due to the error no asm was
> produced, so the scan-asm went unresolved. Split it into two separate
> tests to fix the issue.
>
> Tested on
The test was trying to do too much by both checking for an error, and
checking the resulting assembly. Of course, due to the error no asm was
produced, so the scan-asm went unresolved. Split it into two separate
tests to fix the issue.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu host for bpf-unknown-none target.
