Re: [PATCH] c++/modules: alias CTAD and specializations table

On 11/24/23 13:09, Patrick Palka wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? OK. -- >8 -- A rewritten guide for alias CTAD isn't really a specialization of the original guide, so we shouldn't register it as such. This avoids an ICE in the below

[PATCH] c++/modules: alias CTAD and specializations table

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? -- >8 -- A rewritten guide for alias CTAD isn't really a specialization of the original guide, so we shouldn't register it as such. This avoids an ICE in the below modules testcase which otherwise tries to inspect