On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 03:36:49PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 7/19/23 15:20, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
>
> OK. We might also improve the diagnostic for base classes, perhaps by
> teaching dump_simple_decl about DECL_FIELD_IS_BASE?
On 7/19/23 15:20, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
OK. We might also improve the diagnostic for base classes, perhaps by
teaching dump_simple_decl about DECL_FIELD_IS_BASE?
-- >8 --
Let's suppress -Wmissing-field-initializers for empty clas
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
-- >8 --
Let's suppress -Wmissing-field-initializers for empty classes.
Here I don't think I need the usual COMPLETE_TYPE_P/dependent_type_p
checks.
PR c++/110064
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* typeck2.cc (process_init_construc